<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the iPod Touch is more strategic than the iPhone for Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewchenblog.com/2009/12/06/why-the-ipod-touch-is-more-strategic-than-the-iphone-for-apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewchenblog.com/2009/12/06/why-the-ipod-touch-is-more-strategic-than-the-iphone-for-apple/</link>
	<description>Essays on viral marketing, freemium, and social gaming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 16:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Bent</title>
		<link>http://andrewchenblog.com/2009/12/06/why-the-ipod-touch-is-more-strategic-than-the-iphone-for-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-2708</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Bent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 14:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewchenblog.com/?p=1438#comment-2708</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve actually been using the touch to browse the web at home, because it&#039;s just more fun to use then a full computer interface, of which I&#039;m sick of since I work in a &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;small business IT support&lt;/a&gt;. In fact the only detractor from the web browsing is the screen size, but they handle that elegantly with the zooming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve actually been using the touch to browse the web at home, because it&#39;s just more fun to use then a full computer interface, of which I&#39;m sick of since I work in a <a rel="nofollow">small business IT support</a>. In fact the only detractor from the web browsing is the screen size, but they handle that elegantly with the zooming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Bent</title>
		<link>http://andrewchenblog.com/2009/12/06/why-the-ipod-touch-is-more-strategic-than-the-iphone-for-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-2552</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Bent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 07:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewchenblog.com/?p=1438#comment-2552</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve actually been using the touch to browse the web at home, because it&#039;s just more fun to use then a full computer interface, of which I&#039;m sick of since I work in a &lt;a rel=&quot;follow&quot; href=&quot;http://www.dcgla.com/it-support-los-angeles/it-consulting-los-angeles.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;small business IT support&lt;/a&gt;. In fact the only detractor from the web browsing is the screen size, but they handle that elegantly with the zooming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve actually been using the touch to browse the web at home, because it&#39;s just more fun to use then a full computer interface, of which I&#39;m sick of since I work in a <a rel="follow" href="http://www.dcgla.com/it-support-los-angeles/it-consulting-los-angeles.html" rel="nofollow">small business IT support</a>. In fact the only detractor from the web browsing is the screen size, but they handle that elegantly with the zooming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron</title>
		<link>http://andrewchenblog.com/2009/12/06/why-the-ipod-touch-is-more-strategic-than-the-iphone-for-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-2538</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewchenblog.com/?p=1438#comment-2538</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not so sure this will work as brilliantly as you think. You&#039;ll recall they tried this with the Macintosh in the 1980&#039;s by focussing on getting it into schools so kids would learn to use the computer on a Mac creating the same loyalty and preference. Well, we all know what happened with Microsoft Windows after that (love it or hate it). So while it&#039;s possible this is their strategy and it could work, it&#039;s not exactly fool proof and they know that better than anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not so sure this will work as brilliantly as you think. You&#39;ll recall they tried this with the Macintosh in the 1980&#39;s by focussing on getting it into schools so kids would learn to use the computer on a Mac creating the same loyalty and preference. Well, we all know what happened with Microsoft Windows after that (love it or hate it). So while it&#39;s possible this is their strategy and it could work, it&#39;s not exactly fool proof and they know that better than anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook User</title>
		<link>http://andrewchenblog.com/2009/12/06/why-the-ipod-touch-is-more-strategic-than-the-iphone-for-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-2513</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 02:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewchenblog.com/?p=1438#comment-2513</guid>
		<description>Well, when you travel you don&#039;t want to incur roaming charges so having a cell phone does not help. Having an iPod Touch with Skype saves a lot of money. You also don&#039;t understand how awful AT&amp;T&#039;s network is. iPhone users complain endlessly about the dropped calls, the lack of coverage (even in San Francisco). It&#039;s not like Europe at all where you get a good cellular connection even in the hills of the Cabo de Gata-Nijar national park in Spain (quite remote) or in the basement of a stone castle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, when you travel you don&#39;t want to incur roaming charges so having a cell phone does not help. Having an iPod Touch with Skype saves a lot of money. You also don&#39;t understand how awful AT&#038;T&#39;s network is. iPhone users complain endlessly about the dropped calls, the lack of coverage (even in San Francisco). It&#39;s not like Europe at all where you get a good cellular connection even in the hills of the Cabo de Gata-Nijar national park in Spain (quite remote) or in the basement of a stone castle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook User</title>
		<link>http://andrewchenblog.com/2009/12/06/why-the-ipod-touch-is-more-strategic-than-the-iphone-for-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-2514</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 02:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewchenblog.com/?p=1438#comment-2514</guid>
		<description>You forgot to mention how Wi-Fi Direct (recently blessed by the WiFi Alliance) will affect the iPod Touch. Since these devices do not have a cellular connection and rely on WiFi alone, it is perceived to be somehow &quot;less&quot; than the iPhone. Yet, I traveled to Bali on holiday and took only my iPod Touch. I was able to find free WiFi almost everywhere and do Skype calls. With Wi-Fi Direct in the iPod Touch, people can simply directly connect (without having to go through a WiFi access point) to one another and communicate or  . . . play games!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot to mention how Wi-Fi Direct (recently blessed by the WiFi Alliance) will affect the iPod Touch. Since these devices do not have a cellular connection and rely on WiFi alone, it is perceived to be somehow &#8220;less&#8221; than the iPhone. Yet, I traveled to Bali on holiday and took only my iPod Touch. I was able to find free WiFi almost everywhere and do Skype calls. With Wi-Fi Direct in the iPod Touch, people can simply directly connect (without having to go through a WiFi access point) to one another and communicate or  . . . play games!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://andrewchenblog.com/2009/12/06/why-the-ipod-touch-is-more-strategic-than-the-iphone-for-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-2484</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 07:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewchenblog.com/?p=1438#comment-2484</guid>
		<description>Here in europe most kids of age ten have their own mobile phones it seems. Is USA that far behind still?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here in europe most kids of age ten have their own mobile phones it seems. Is USA that far behind still?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Chen</title>
		<link>http://andrewchenblog.com/2009/12/06/why-the-ipod-touch-is-more-strategic-than-the-iphone-for-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-2480</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Chen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 01:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewchenblog.com/?p=1438#comment-2480</guid>
		<description>You hang out with nerds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You hang out with nerds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devyn Cairns</title>
		<link>http://andrewchenblog.com/2009/12/06/why-the-ipod-touch-is-more-strategic-than-the-iphone-for-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-2479</link>
		<dc:creator>Devyn Cairns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewchenblog.com/?p=1438#comment-2479</guid>
		<description>Interesting... however, I think the iPhone/iPod Touch needs more openness if Apple really wants it to succeed. Very few people I know have non-jailbroken devices, because they like to use whatever they want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230; however, I think the iPhone/iPod Touch needs more openness if Apple really wants it to succeed. Very few people I know have non-jailbroken devices, because they like to use whatever they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

