<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s happening with the top Facebook apps?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewchenblog.com/2008/02/10/whats-happening-with-the-top-facebook-apps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewchenblog.com/2008/02/10/whats-happening-with-the-top-facebook-apps/</link>
	<description>Essays on viral marketing, freemium, and social gaming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 15:07:14 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Morehouse</title>
		<link>http://andrewchenblog.com/2008/02/10/whats-happening-with-the-top-facebook-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-381</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Morehouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 02:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewchenblog.com/2008/02/10/whats-happening-with-the-top-facebook-apps/#comment-381</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Compare People is declining because it&#039;s a very interesting concept that&#039;s poorly executed.  There is a lot of frustration on the message board for it, and the authors insist on adding a lot of stupid and annoying viral hooks into the app which makes it a pain to use.  For example, it asks you to invite friends after EVERY comparison set.  Maybe after the first 30 times, it should realize you&#039;re probably not going to invite anyone else.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Compare People is declining because it&#8217;s a very interesting concept that&#8217;s poorly executed.  There is a lot of frustration on the message board for it, and the authors insist on adding a lot of stupid and annoying viral hooks into the app which makes it a pain to use.  For example, it asks you to invite friends after EVERY comparison set.  Maybe after the first 30 times, it should realize you&#8217;re probably not going to invite anyone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy</title>
		<link>http://andrewchenblog.com/2008/02/10/whats-happening-with-the-top-facebook-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewchenblog.com/2008/02/10/whats-happening-with-the-top-facebook-apps/#comment-380</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Andrew,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve been trying to find a source that shows performance overtime for facebook apps.  The charts you have, is this accessible data anyone can tap into or did you compile the data on your own?  Be glad to get any tips!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;
CJ&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrew,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been trying to find a source that shows performance overtime for facebook apps.  The charts you have, is this accessible data anyone can tap into or did you compile the data on your own?  Be glad to get any tips!</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
CJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://andrewchenblog.com/2008/02/10/whats-happening-with-the-top-facebook-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 05:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewchenblog.com/2008/02/10/whats-happening-with-the-top-facebook-apps/#comment-379</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The profile cleanup wizard probably wiped a bunch of apps off profile pages, which is a huge source of virality for apps. Also, minifeed controls like &quot;i didn&#039;t do this&quot; and newsfeed controls that allow you to bury events are probably taking their toll on the most annoying/viral apps. Additionally, platform changes such as giving preference to newsfeed links that do *not* require an app install, plus eliminating events where you were not a primary actor.... all these things are effectively Facebook&#039;s spam control experiments. They amount to a predictable decline in usage for the biggest apps, most of which are useless spam-generators.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The profile cleanup wizard probably wiped a bunch of apps off profile pages, which is a huge source of virality for apps. Also, minifeed controls like &#8220;i didn&#8217;t do this&#8221; and newsfeed controls that allow you to bury events are probably taking their toll on the most annoying/viral apps. Additionally, platform changes such as giving preference to newsfeed links that do *not* require an app install, plus eliminating events where you were not a primary actor&#8230;. all these things are effectively Facebook&#8217;s spam control experiments. They amount to a predictable decline in usage for the biggest apps, most of which are useless spam-generators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Dewhirst</title>
		<link>http://andrewchenblog.com/2008/02/10/whats-happening-with-the-top-facebook-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Dewhirst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 04:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewchenblog.com/2008/02/10/whats-happening-with-the-top-facebook-apps/#comment-378</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Andrew,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As usual another great post.  My thinking is that people are getting tired of application spam and now even if a friend sends them an invite they don&#039;t want to go through the hassle of launching yet another dumb app.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I struggle with what is a good app for FB - it seems like if an app is worth building then FBML seriously limits what you can do.  Once you have been sent a drink or bitten by a zombie - do you really want to do it again?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The native functionality within FB addresses a lot of user needs - I think the test would be - what FB app would you pay for?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In any event thanks Andrew for asking questions and creating a place for a dialog.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers - Eric&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Andrew,</p>
<p>As usual another great post.  My thinking is that people are getting tired of application spam and now even if a friend sends them an invite they don&#8217;t want to go through the hassle of launching yet another dumb app.  </p>
<p>I struggle with what is a good app for FB &#8211; it seems like if an app is worth building then FBML seriously limits what you can do.  Once you have been sent a drink or bitten by a zombie &#8211; do you really want to do it again?</p>
<p>The native functionality within FB addresses a lot of user needs &#8211; I think the test would be &#8211; what FB app would you pay for?</p>
<p>In any event thanks Andrew for asking questions and creating a place for a dialog.</p>
<p>Cheers &#8211; Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
