@andrewchen

New here? Check out my list of featured essays and Blogging roadmap

2008 anti-prediction ;-)

Greg Linden writes in a recent blog about his one prediction for 2008: The coming 2008 dot-com crash.

Early January is the time we see many predictions for 2008. I have not played this game since 2006, but I want to chime in this year.

I am only going to make one prediction, but one with broad impact. We will see a dot-com crash in 2008. It will be more prolonged and deeper than the crash of 2000.

I love it ;-) Yet, I’m much more optimistic about the coming year.

So I think things will continue at the pace they are, and even pick up, at least until late 2009 to 2010. Here’s my reasoning:

  • The "broader" economy and investors have not been investing as bubbliciously as in the late 90s
  • As long as there are big exits from tech startups, investor interest will only grow – this will cause the late majority and laggards (as far as investors, press, etc.) to get excited about the tech economy, and then throw money at the situation
  • As there are good companies out there with real revenues, when these companies exit, it will continue an upwards trend in interest. For example, if the tech industry started a slump but then Facebook exited, wouldn’t it only cause renewed interest?
  • HOWEVER, as these good companies exit, then all there’ll be left is bad startups (at least percentage-wise) – thus causing more bubble-like trends to occur

The question then, is how many good companies are left in the ecosystem, and how long will it take before they exit? As long as there’s a stream of exits, I think everyone will be happy.

Based on what I’ve seen out in the SF tech scene, there are at least a dozen or more startups with revenues beyond $10MM, growing at a significant rate. And IMHO, their revenues are coming from sources that are not likely to crash in 2008. A large percentage of these will take 2-3 years to exit, and beyond that, bubble conditions might be ripe – but not before then ;-)

What do you guys think??

Like this post?
If you liked this post, please subscribe or follow me on Twitter. You can also find more essays here.

Written by Andrew Chen
January 4th, 2008 at 2:11 pm
  • jason

    I think your first point is the most important. What causes a crash is over-investment in unworthy assets. VC investment is still a sliver of what it was in 2000, mainly due to the relative capital efficiency of today’s web companies (and lack of telecom bubble to compound the effect). Also keeping in mind that VC investment is a very small piece of the overall institutional investment pie. For the most part, public markets have stayed out of this wave. If this bubble does “pop”, it won’t be very loud.

Recent posts

Want more? Featured essays and book recommendations