<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s right? Panel-based measurement versus raw server logs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewchenblog.com/2007/10/22/whos-right-panel-based-measurement-versus-raw-server-logs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewchenblog.com/2007/10/22/whos-right-panel-based-measurement-versus-raw-server-logs/</link>
	<description>Essays on viral marketing, freemium, and social gaming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 02:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://andrewchenblog.com/2007/10/22/whos-right-panel-based-measurement-versus-raw-server-logs/comment-page-1/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewchenblog.com/2007/10/22/whos-right-panel-based-measurement-versus-raw-server-logs/#comment-554</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I agree in part.  Panels should offer a pixel option in order to enable publishers to help the panels improve their reporting.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, I think it&#039;s more important for a stats package to be internally consistent than to be partially accurate.  For example, lets say I&#039;m comparing Google.com and Yahoo.com in comScore.  Hypothetically, comScore has a pixel on Google&#039;s page, but not one on Yahoo&#039;s page.  I&#039;d rather comScore report to me the panel-extrapolated data for both Google and Yahoo than the pixel-logs for Google and the panel-extrapolated data from Yahoo.  Any errors in methodology will come out in the wash in a side-by-side comparison as long as the methodology for report both stats are internally consistent.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But, it would be create if comScore created some kind of &quot;pixel-outreach&quot; program to improve their ability to extrapolate from a panel.  But, my gut says they&#039;re probably already doing this.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree in part.  Panels should offer a pixel option in order to enable publishers to help the panels improve their reporting.  </p>
<p>However, I think it&#8217;s more important for a stats package to be internally consistent than to be partially accurate.  For example, lets say I&#8217;m comparing Google.com and Yahoo.com in comScore.  Hypothetically, comScore has a pixel on Google&#8217;s page, but not one on Yahoo&#8217;s page.  I&#8217;d rather comScore report to me the panel-extrapolated data for both Google and Yahoo than the pixel-logs for Google and the panel-extrapolated data from Yahoo.  Any errors in methodology will come out in the wash in a side-by-side comparison as long as the methodology for report both stats are internally consistent.</p>
<p>But, it would be create if comScore created some kind of &#8220;pixel-outreach&#8221; program to improve their ability to extrapolate from a panel.  But, my gut says they&#8217;re probably already doing this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://andrewchenblog.com/2007/10/22/whos-right-panel-based-measurement-versus-raw-server-logs/comment-page-1/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewchenblog.com/2007/10/22/whos-right-panel-based-measurement-versus-raw-server-logs/#comment-553</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good luck on getting your wisdom teeth out.  you&#039;ll need it :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck on getting your wisdom teeth out.  you&#8217;ll need it <img src='http://andrewchenblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

