<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WSJ article describing the difficulty of monetizing UGC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewchenblog.com/2007/10/18/wsj-article-describing-the-difficulty-of-monetizing-ugc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewchenblog.com/2007/10/18/wsj-article-describing-the-difficulty-of-monetizing-ugc/</link>
	<description>Essays on viral marketing, freemium, and social gaming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 01:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John DeMayo</title>
		<link>http://andrewchenblog.com/2007/10/18/wsj-article-describing-the-difficulty-of-monetizing-ugc/comment-page-1/#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>John DeMayo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 06:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewchenblog.com/2007/10/18/wsj-article-describing-the-difficulty-of-monetizing-ugc/#comment-555</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Most companies, brokers, and networks deal with user-generated, lower value, and hard to control content early on, and as companies mature they move &quot;up-market&quot; to higher quality more easily monitored content.  I know this was the way with Advertising.com and most other ad networks, as well as a number of site aggregators.  Given google has started with high quality, completely controlled content and is moving in the opposite direction, their errors in tackling this hard-to-tame media are made more public then a startups would.  It&#039;s a tough place to be and one most companies don&#039;t find themselves in.  Most companies move up-market as they get older, whereas google finds itself moving downmarket for growth.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most companies, brokers, and networks deal with user-generated, lower value, and hard to control content early on, and as companies mature they move &#8220;up-market&#8221; to higher quality more easily monitored content.  I know this was the way with Advertising.com and most other ad networks, as well as a number of site aggregators.  Given google has started with high quality, completely controlled content and is moving in the opposite direction, their errors in tackling this hard-to-tame media are made more public then a startups would.  It&#8217;s a tough place to be and one most companies don&#8217;t find themselves in.  Most companies move up-market as they get older, whereas google finds itself moving downmarket for growth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

