<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unclear definitions for click fraud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewchenblog.com/2006/10/24/unclear-definitions-for-click-fraud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewchenblog.com/2006/10/24/unclear-definitions-for-click-fraud/</link>
	<description>Essays on viral marketing, freemium, and social gaming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 02:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Mattson</title>
		<link>http://andrewchenblog.com/2006/10/24/unclear-definitions-for-click-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-871</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Mattson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 17:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewchenblog.com/2006/10/24/unclear-definitions-for-click-fraud/#comment-871</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The potential issue with a CPA model versus a CPM or CPC model is that it places much more of the risk on the publisher. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Theoretically, the rewards ($) paid by the advertiser to the publisher should then increase. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I feel that the difficulty comes when you start to look at the how the numbers play out. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For examples, imagine an advertiser is paying $1 for a click (not an extreme price in today&#039;s environment). And let us assume that the advertiser converts 1% of their traffic to their website (ignoring lifetime customer value and brand building value) to immediate sales. So essentially, they&#039;re buying a sale for $100 via CPC. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Theoretically, you should be able convince that advertiser to now pay that $100 to the publisher. But will they? My gut says that there is going to be some significant sticker shock in the transition. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, because the advertiser should benefit in additional ways from gaining a visitor if not a long-term customer they should actually pay more than that $100. Do you think advertisers are going to be willing to pay for the value of those additional benefits to a total of say $125? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not saying that CPA is not where the market is going. I&#039;m just saying that it&#039;s going to be VERY bumpy and VERY slow. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think that looking at the affiliate industry can give you some insight into the challenges of moving to a higher publisher risk, higher publisher reward model. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The potential issue with a CPA model versus a CPM or CPC model is that it places much more of the risk on the publisher. </p>
<p>Theoretically, the rewards ($) paid by the advertiser to the publisher should then increase. </p>
<p>I feel that the difficulty comes when you start to look at the how the numbers play out. </p>
<p>For examples, imagine an advertiser is paying $1 for a click (not an extreme price in today&#8217;s environment). And let us assume that the advertiser converts 1% of their traffic to their website (ignoring lifetime customer value and brand building value) to immediate sales. So essentially, they&#8217;re buying a sale for $100 via CPC. </p>
<p>Theoretically, you should be able convince that advertiser to now pay that $100 to the publisher. But will they? My gut says that there is going to be some significant sticker shock in the transition. </p>
<p>Also, because the advertiser should benefit in additional ways from gaining a visitor if not a long-term customer they should actually pay more than that $100. Do you think advertisers are going to be willing to pay for the value of those additional benefits to a total of say $125? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that CPA is not where the market is going. I&#8217;m just saying that it&#8217;s going to be VERY bumpy and VERY slow. </p>
<p>I think that looking at the affiliate industry can give you some insight into the challenges of moving to a higher publisher risk, higher publisher reward model. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

